Programming, Statistics

Ordering and structuring text in STATA

Like most researchers, I have difficulty finding data. On occasion, when I manage to find data, it comes in a useless or meaningless format. For example, a local police department offered to print out all of its police reports for me for the last 15 years at $0.25 a page… which I would have to enter by hand.  I politely declined.  Here’s an example of sorting out city titles from a poorly formatted document- a short version of that document can be found here.

The first and most important thing is to have your data loaded.

clear all
use "location", clear

This loads the data and clears any extra junk STATA may have floating around.  The next thing to do is identify any sort of regular pattern.  The first identifiable patterns were that titles for cities began every 64 lines, and sometimes went for between 3 or 4 lines, before having another 64 lines of regular income reports (useless at this point) are posted. The second pattern is that they all are either villages, cities, or towns.  Below are some attempts at accomplishing this goal via making some sort of indicator every 64 lines (didn’t work), or marking every area that starts with CITY (inefficient). Don’t forget to put strings in quotation marks!

*Marks every line with a list that counts 0...63. I thought the 63rd would be useful, but because of the irregular length of the header, it's worthless.
*gen city_titles=mod(_n-1,64)
*Is the line saying city? If so, give it a mark, literally. 
*gen mark=cond(var1=="CITY","mark",".",".")

Notice that using (*) comments out the line in STATA, and (.) is STATA’s version of NA.  Here is a more successful attempt:

*Identify if it's probably a title
gen mark=1 if var1=="CITY"
replace mark=1 if var1=="TOWN"
replace mark=1 if var1=="VILLAGE"

Don’t forget the double equals!  In STATA, all if statements I have observed are followed by (==) instead of (=), and I still manage to forget them often!  Next, I will create 3 more indicators, aptly labeled mark_1 to mark_3, all showing if it follows the indicator above by 1, 2, or 3 variables. In programming, it is better to give clear, boring, brief names rather than unclear mess. I would rather have a long object name than an unclear short one, since you never know who is going to have to read your code:

*Is it following a title?
gen mark_1=mark[_n-1]
gen mark_2=mark[_n-2]
gen mark_3=mark[_n-3]

In retrospect, I could have perhaps consolidated those more efficiently. Does anyone else see how I could have done that in a single variable (mark) instead of having multiple indicators (mark_1…mark_3)?  Either way, I have some extra chaff I have to eliminate. having (.)’s in my data set is agitating. Let’s set those all as 0’s, and sum the remaining columns together in something called “total”, so I know if they have an indicator (1 or more) or not (0).  Then we can drop everything we don’t want!

*Eliminate non-numerical entries as numeric.
replace mark=0 if mark==.
replace mark_1=0 if mark_1==.
replace mark_2=0 if mark_2==.
replace mark_3=0 if mark_3==.

*Is it marked?
gen total=mark+mark_1+mark_2+mark_3

drop if total!=1

Bam!  Much better. We dropped somewhere around 80% of our unwanted junk right there! We still could never compile this all by hand, though.  Here, we want it to concatenate all our variables 1…11 in a downward direction.  So we make a local marco list called to_combine, since that’s what we’ll be doing with them.

local to_combine var1 var2 var3 var4 var5 var6 var7 var8 var9 var10 var11

Below is a STATA style do-loop, a common element in meaningful programming everywhere.  We want to repeat for each and every variable in the “to_combine” list a series of operations designed to deal with a few regular problems we observed. Firstly, we want to fix an issue with names. You may notice “FOND DU LAC” takes up 3 columns rather than the intended 1, being as that is the name of a city/town/village/county in Wisconsin.  This is the first thing we fix, by dropping the spaces with “DU” and “LAC” and replacing all “FOND” entries with “FOND DU LAC”.  Such a procedure is repeated for other problems we noted. There are 300+ problems we found, so this is not a perfect fix yet, (as noted by entry v9/2 in the “after” image below), but it’s much better. The second thing we fix is putting “COUNTY” horizontally under “TOTAL”, since in the original document (pdf), we know that after an entry says “TOTAL”, it always says the total for the county, not for any other grouping.  Lastly, we want it to concatenate horizontally but stop before it hits any part of the income sheet.  Stata uses & for “and” and | for “or”. You may use both in long chains for a single if statement. This last was done by a bit of trial and error to make sure I got it right. That’s fine, since computers are cheap and thinking hurts.  It stops at the line containing every end of line indicator I could think of, like “TAXES”, “POPULATION”, or “REVENUES”, which are clearly not city titles.

foreach var in `to_combine'{

*We have a space problem (Part 1)
replace `var'="" if `var'=="DU" 
...snipped...
replace `var'="LA CROSSE" if `var'=="LA"

*Puts county under total.  It's a mandatory identifier visible in the pdf. (Part 2)
replace `var'="" if `var'=="COUNTY"
replace `var'="COUNTY" if `var'[_n-2]=="TOTAL"

*Concatenates appropriately, stopping if it hits anything
replace `var'=`var'[_n-1]+"."+`var' if var2[_n-1]!="POPULATION" & var1[_n-1]!="REVENUES" & var1[_n-1]!="TAXES" & mark_3[_n-1]!=1 & var2!="POPULATION" & var1!="REVENUES" & var1!="TAXES"

}

Now, let’s just drop the stuff we don’t need, and we’re looking at a much much cleaner worksheet, giving us the before/after image shown below:

*Drops excess rows or columns.
drop if mark==1
drop if mark_1==1
drop if mark_2==1
drop if var2=="POPULATION"
drop if var1=="REVENUES"
drop if var1=="TAXES"

Image

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Ordering and structuring text in STATA

  1. Can you give a brief screenshot showing current (problematic) output, expected (manually corrected) output, and some fairly raw data? I’m not able to follow where and what the problem is. I feel that if you are having trouble with multi-word placenames then buffering until numerical value then figuring out the spacing once you know the ending would be smooth.

    1. Hey Tw33k,

      I am hoping the screenshots are visible in the jpg attached to the post at the end. Should I move it forward? The issue is converting the headers (multiple words that are poorly spaced both horizontally and vertically) into single entries.
      Regardless, raw data should be available via this link, and the screenshot of before and after should be here.

      If that didn’t work, maybe I should learn more about links!

      I’d like to recover the headers from below:

      CITY, CITY, CITY, CITY, CITY, CITY, CITY, CITY,//
      OF, TOTAL, OF, OF, TOTAL, OF, OF, OF,//
      ADAMS, ADAMS, ASHLAND, MELLEN, ASHLAND, BARRON, CHETEK, CUMBERLAND,//
      COUNTY, COUNTY,,,,,,,,//
      2010, POPULATION, 1921, 1921, 8453, 786, 9239, 3336, 2270, 2419//

      Into:

      CITY.OF.ADAMS,CITY.TOTAL.ADAMS.COUNTY, CITY.OF.ASHLAND, CITY.OF.MELLEN, CITY.TOTAL.ASHLAND.COUNTY, CITY.OF.BARRON, CITY.OF.CHETEK, CITY.OF.CUMBERLAND //

      for all collections of headers in the entire document.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s